HPC trends

In the area of productivity, several projects are underway, crafting novel concepts for design of RC applications and systems, including new methods and tools for design formulation and prediction, hardware virtualization, module and core reuse, design verification and optimization, and programming with high-level languages.

Each FPGA is a Stratix-III E260 device from Altera with 254K logic elements, 768 18x18 multipliers, and more than 4GB of DDR2 memory directly attached via three banks.

In addition, several new collaborations have been inspired by Novo-G, with other research groups, for example, Boston University and the Air Force Research Laboratory, as well as tools vendors such as Impulse Accelerated Technologies and Mitrionics.

However, looking ahead more broadly, reconfigurable logic may be featured in future devices with a variety of structures, granularities, functionalities, etc., perhaps very similar to today's FPGAs or perhaps quite different.

HPCwire: The new Novo-G reconfigurable computing system at the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC) has been up and running for just a few months.

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

For example, HPC machines lauded in the upper tier of the TOP500 list as most powerful in the world are remarkably high in performance yet also remarkably massive in size, energy, heat, and cost, all featuring programmable, fixed-logic devices, for example, CPU, GPU, Cell.

Will RC be a niche solution in specific application areas or do you see this technology being used in general-purpose platforms that will be widely deployed?

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

Programmable fixed-logic devices no matter their form feature a "one size fits all" or "Jack of all trades" philosophy, with a predefined structure of parallelism, yet attempting to support all applications or some major subset.

In the area of productivity, several projects are underway, crafting novel concepts for design of RC applications and systems, including new methods and tools for design formulation and prediction, hardware virtualization, module and core reuse, design verification and optimization, and programming with high-level languages.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

For example, HPC machines lauded in the upper tier of the TOP500 list as most powerful in the world are remarkably high in performance yet also remarkably massive in size, energy, heat, and cost, all featuring programmable, fixed-logic devices, for example, CPU, GPU, Cell.

Programmable fixed-logic devices no matter their form feature a "one size fits all" or "Jack of all trades" philosophy, with a predefined structure of parallelism, yet attempting to support all applications or some major subset.

Perhaps most obviously, they are viewed as inexpensive, due to leveraging of the gaming market.

The purpose of Novo-G is to support a variety of research projects in CHREC related to RC performance, productivity and sustainability.

In the area of productivity, several projects are underway, crafting novel concepts for design of RC applications and systems, including new methods and tools for design formulation and prediction, hardware virtualization, module and core reuse, design verification and optimization, and programming with high-level languages.

Altogether, Novo-G features 96 of these FPGAs, with an upgrade underway that by January will double its RC capacity to 192 FPGAs via two coupled RC boards per server.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

Each FPGA is a Stratix-III E260 device from Altera with 254K logic elements, 768 18x18 multipliers, and more than 4GB of DDR2 memory directly attached via three banks.

Housed in three racks, Novo-G consists of 24 standard Linux servers, plus a head node, connected by DDR InfiniBand and GigE.

George: Naturally, as a relatively new paradigm of computing, RC has started with emphasis in a few targeted areas, for example, aerospace and bioinformatics, where missions and users require dramatic improvement only possible by a revolutionary approach.

Founded in 2007, CHREC is a national research center under the auspices of the I/UCRC program of the National Science Foundation and consists of more than 30 academic, industry and government partners working collaboratively on research in this field.

What are the advantages of FPGAs for high-performance computing compared to fixed-logic architectures such as CPUs, GPUs, the Cell processor?

Last but not least, as process densities increase and become more susceptible to faults, environments become harsher, and resources become more prone to soft or hard errors, research challenges arise in fault tolerance.

Thus, in theory, the hardware can be matched to the software, rather than the other way around.

As principal challenges -- performance, productivity, and sustainability -- become more pronounced, and as R&D in RC progresses, we believe that the RC paradigm will mature and expand in its role and influence to eventually become dominant in a broad range of applications, from satellites to servers to supercomputers.

As life-cycle costs of energy and cooling rise to approach and exceed that of software and hardware in total cost of ownership, these technologies may become unsustainable.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

In addition, several new collaborations have been inspired by Novo-G, with other research groups, for example, Boston University and the Air Force Research Laboratory, as well as tools vendors such as Impulse Accelerated Technologies and Mitrionics.

It should be noted that RC, as a new paradigm of computing, is broader than FPGA acceleration for HPC. FPGA devices are the leading commercial technology available today that is capable of RC, albeit not originally designed for RC, and thus FPGAs are the focal point for virtually all experimental research and commercial deployments, with a growing list of success stories.

Thus, as is natural for any new paradigm and set of technologies, design productivity is an important challenge at present for RC in general and FPGA devices in particular, so that HPC users, and others, can take full advantage without having to be trained as electrical engineers.

While there are a handful of commercial offerings from companies such as Convey Computer, XtremeData, GiDel, Mitrionics, and Impulse Accelerated Technologies, RC is still an area of active research.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

It should be noted that RC, as a new paradigm of computing, is broader than FPGA acceleration for HPC. FPGA devices are the leading commercial technology available today that is capable of RC, albeit not originally designed for RC, and thus FPGAs are the focal point for virtually all experimental research and commercial deployments, with a growing list of success stories.

However, we believe that inherent weaknesses of any fixed-logic device technology ... in terms of broad applicability at speed and energy efficiency, will eventually become limiting factors.

In this area, CHREC researchers are developing device- and system-level RC concepts and architectures to support scenarios that require high performance, versatility, and reliability with low power, cooling, and size, be it for outer space or the HPC computer room.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

Goals and challenges in three principal areas are vitally important yet increasingly in conflict: performance, productivity, and sustainability.

However, looking ahead more broadly, reconfigurable logic may be featured in future devices with a variety of structures, granularities, functionalities, etc., perhaps very similar to today's FPGAs or perhaps quite different.

Founded in 2007, CHREC is a national research center under the auspices of the I/UCRC program of the National Science Foundation and consists of more than 30 academic, industry and government partners working collaboratively on research in this field.

For example, HPC machines lauded in the upper tier of the TOP500 list as most powerful in the world are remarkably high in performance yet also remarkably massive in size, energy, heat, and cost, all featuring programmable, fixed-logic devices, for example, CPU, GPU, Cell.

What are the advantages of FPGAs for high-performance computing compared to fixed-logic architectures such as CPUs, GPUs, the Cell processor?

In the area of productivity, several projects are underway, crafting novel concepts for design of RC applications and systems, including new methods and tools for design formulation and prediction, hardware virtualization, module and core reuse, design verification and optimization, and programming with high-level languages.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

However, RC is viewed by many as lagging in effective concepts and tools for application development by domain scientists and other users to harness this potency without special skills.

Thus, in theory, the hardware can be matched to the software, rather than the other way around.

Alan George: HPC is approaching a crossroads in terms of enabling technologies and their inherent strengths and weaknesses.

What are the advantages of FPGAs for high-performance computing compared to fixed-logic architectures such as CPUs, GPUs, the Cell processor?

Goals and challenges in three principal areas are vitally important yet increasingly in conflict: performance, productivity, and sustainability.

CHREC is run by Dr. Alan George, who gave an address at the SC09 Workshop on High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing Technology and Applications (HPRCTA'09) on November 15.

For example, HPC machines lauded in the upper tier of the TOP500 list as most powerful in the world are remarkably high in performance yet also remarkably massive in size, energy, heat, and cost, all featuring programmable, fixed-logic devices, for example, CPU, GPU, Cell.

An established technology is dominant for many years; it experiences growth over a long period of time from evolutionary advances, and one day it is partially or wholly supplanted by a new, revolutionary technology, but only after that new technology has navigated a long and winding road of research and development.

With this perspective, fixed-logic computing and accelerators are following a more evolutionary path, whereas RC is relatively new and revolutionary.

By contrast, numerous research studies show that computing with reconfigurable-logic devices -- FPGAs, et al. -- is fundamentally superior in terms of speed and energy, due to the many advantages of adaptive, customizable hardware parallelism.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

For example, HPC machines lauded in the upper tier of the TOP500 list as most powerful in the world are remarkably high in performance yet also remarkably massive in size, energy, heat, and cost, all featuring programmable, fixed-logic devices, for example, CPU, GPU, Cell.

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

Thus, in theory, the hardware can be matched to the software, rather than the other way around.

Perhaps most obviously, they are viewed as inexpensive, due to leveraging of the gaming market.

In this regard, many vendors and research groups are conducting R&D and developing new concepts, tools, and products to address this challenge.

Will RC be a niche solution in specific application areas or do you see this technology being used in general-purpose platforms that will be widely deployed?

Alan George: HPC is approaching a crossroads in terms of enabling technologies and their inherent strengths and weaknesses.

In the area of productivity, several projects are underway, crafting novel concepts for design of RC applications and systems, including new methods and tools for design formulation and prediction, hardware virtualization, module and core reuse, design verification and optimization, and programming with high-level languages.

Founded in 2007, CHREC is a national research center under the auspices of the I/UCRC program of the National Science Foundation and consists of more than 30 academic, industry and government partners working collaboratively on research in this field.

As life-cycle costs of energy and cooling rise to approach and exceed that of software and hardware in total cost of ownership, these technologies may become unsustainable.

As life-cycle costs of energy and cooling rise to approach and exceed that of software and hardware in total cost of ownership, these technologies may become unsustainable.

Perhaps most obviously, they are viewed as inexpensive, due to leveraging of the gaming market.

NASA, DOD, and other space-related agencies worldwide are increasingly featuring RC technologies in their platforms, as is the aerospace community in general.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

George: There are two major factors on the horizon that we believe will dramatically change the landscape.

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

Both of these project areas of productivity and architecture relate well to HPC.
Meanwhile, one of the unique features of some RC devices is their ability to reconfigure portions of the hardware of the chip while other portions remain unchanged and thus operational, and this powerful feature involves many research and design challenges being studied and addressed by several teams.

For example, HPC machines lauded in the upper tier of the TOP500 list as most powerful in the world are remarkably high in performance yet also remarkably massive in size, energy, heat, and cost, all featuring programmable, fixed-logic devices, for example, CPU, GPU, Cell.

What has held back reconfigurable computing technology in this application space?

CHREC is run by Dr. Alan George, who gave an address at the SC09 Workshop on High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing Technology and Applications (HPRCTA'09) on November 15.

Meanwhile, throughout society, energy cost, source, and availability are a growing concern.

Each server features a tightly-coupled set of four FPGA accelerators on a ProcStar-III PCIe board from GiDEL supported by a conventional multicore CPU, motherboard, disk, etc.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

NASA, DOD, and other space-related agencies worldwide are increasingly featuring RC technologies in their platforms, as is the aerospace community in general.

Like any new paradigm, there are R&D challenges that must be solved before it can become more broadly applicable and eventually ubiquitous.

Thus, as is natural for any new paradigm and set of technologies, design productivity is an important challenge at present for RC in general and FPGA devices in particular, so that HPC users, and others, can take full advantage without having to be trained as electrical engineers.

In this regard, many vendors and research groups are conducting R&D and developing new concepts, tools, and products to address this challenge.

NASA, DOD, and other space-related agencies worldwide are increasingly featuring RC technologies in their platforms, as is the aerospace community in general.

George: There are several reasons why Cell and GPU accelerators are more popular in HPC at present.

It should be noted that RC, as a new paradigm of computing, is broader than FPGA acceleration for HPC. FPGA devices are the leading commercial technology available today that is capable of RC, albeit not originally designed for RC, and thus FPGAs are the focal point for virtually all experimental research and commercial deployments, with a growing list of success stories.

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

The purpose of Novo-G is to support a variety of research projects in CHREC related to RC performance, productivity and sustainability.

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

An established technology is dominant for many years; it experiences growth over a long period of time from evolutionary advances, and one day it is partially or wholly supplanted by a new, revolutionary technology, but only after that new technology has navigated a long and winding road of research and development.

For example, in our first application experiment working with domain scientists in computational biology, performance was sustained with 96 FPGAs that matched that of the largest machines on the NSF TeraGrid, yet provided by a machine that is hundreds of times lower in cost, power, cooling, size, etc.

Housed in three racks, Novo-G consists of 24 standard Linux servers, plus a head node, connected by DDR InfiniBand and GigE.

Each server features a tightly-coupled set of four FPGA accelerators on a ProcStar-III PCIe board from GiDEL supported by a conventional multicore CPU, motherboard, disk, etc.

Meanwhile, throughout society, energy cost, source, and availability are a growing concern.

HPCwire: The new Novo-G reconfigurable computing system at the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC) has been up and running for just a few months.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

Moreover, in terms of fundamental computing principles, they are an evolutionary development in device architecture, and as such represent less risk.

In the future, RC will become more important for a growing set of missions, applications, and users and, concomitantly, it will become more amenable to them, so that productivity is maximized alongside performance and sustainability.

The driving issues in this community -- again performance, productivity, and especially sustainability -- are becoming increasingly important in HPC.
HPCwire: In the past couple of years, non-RC accelerators like the Cell processor and now, especially, general-purpose GPUs have been making big news in the HPC world, with major deployments planned.

In addition, several new collaborations have been inspired by Novo-G, with other research groups, for example, Boston University and the Air Force Research Laboratory, as well as tools vendors such as Impulse Accelerated Technologies and Mitrionics.

While there are a handful of commercial offerings from companies such as Convey Computer, XtremeData, GiDel, Mitrionics, and Impulse Accelerated Technologies, RC is still an area of active research.

Each server features a tightly-coupled set of four FPGA accelerators on a ProcStar-III PCIe board from GiDEL supported by a conventional multicore CPU, motherboard, disk, etc.

An established technology is dominant for many years; it experiences growth over a long period of time from evolutionary advances, and one day it is partially or wholly supplanted by a new, revolutionary technology, but only after that new technology has navigated a long and winding road of research and development.

Altogether, Novo-G features 96 of these FPGAs, with an upgrade underway that by January will double its RC capacity to 192 FPGAs via two coupled RC boards per server.

Thus, as is natural for any new paradigm and set of technologies, design productivity is an important challenge at present for RC in general and FPGA devices in particular, so that HPC users, and others, can take full advantage without having to be trained as electrical engineers.

For example, HPC machines lauded in the upper tier of the TOP500 list as most powerful in the world are remarkably high in performance yet also remarkably massive in size, energy, heat, and cost, all featuring programmable, fixed-logic devices, for example, CPU, GPU, Cell.

It should be noted that RC, as a new paradigm of computing, is broader than FPGA acceleration for HPC. FPGA devices are the leading commercial technology available today that is capable of RC, albeit not originally designed for RC, and thus FPGAs are the focal point for virtually all experimental research and commercial deployments, with a growing list of success stories.

As principal challenges -- performance, productivity, and sustainability -- become more pronounced, and as R&D in RC progresses, we believe that the RC paradigm will mature and expand in its role and influence to eventually become dominant in a broad range of applications, from satellites to servers to supercomputers.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

With this perspective, fixed-logic computing and accelerators are following a more evolutionary path, whereas RC is relatively new and revolutionary.

Meanwhile, throughout society, energy cost, source, and availability are a growing concern.

In contrast, the structure of parallelism in reconfigurable-logic devices can be customized, that is, reconfigured, for each application or task on the fly, being versatile yet optimized specifically for each problem at hand.

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

Will RC be a niche solution in specific application areas or do you see this technology being used in general-purpose platforms that will be widely deployed?

By contrast, numerous research studies show that computing with reconfigurable-logic devices -- FPGAs, et al. -- is fundamentally superior in terms of speed and energy, due to the many advantages of adaptive, customizable hardware parallelism.

Thus, in theory, the hardware can be matched to the software, rather than the other way around.

Goals and challenges in three principal areas are vitally important yet increasingly in conflict: performance, productivity, and sustainability.

It should be noted that RC, as a new paradigm of computing, is broader than FPGA acceleration for HPC. FPGA devices are the leading commercial technology available today that is capable of RC, albeit not originally designed for RC, and thus FPGAs are the focal point for virtually all experimental research and commercial deployments, with a growing list of success stories.

The driving issues in this community -- again performance, productivity, and especially sustainability -- are becoming increasingly important in HPC.
HPCwire: In the past couple of years, non-RC accelerators like the Cell processor and now, especially, general-purpose GPUs have been making big news in the HPC world, with major deployments planned.

HPCwire: FPGA-based reconfigurable computing has captured some loyal followers in the HPC community.

This tremendous advantage in parallel computing potency comes with the challenge of complexity.

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

As life-cycle costs of energy and cooling rise to approach and exceed that of software and hardware in total cost of ownership, these technologies may become unsustainable.

In this area, CHREC researchers are developing device- and system-level RC concepts and architectures to support scenarios that require high performance, versatility, and reliability with low power, cooling, and size, be it for outer space or the HPC computer room.

Programmable fixed-logic devices no matter their form feature a "one size fits all" or "Jack of all trades" philosophy, with a predefined structure of parallelism, yet attempting to support all applications or some major subset.

HPCwire: FPGA-based reconfigurable computing has captured some loyal followers in the HPC community.

Thus, as is natural for any new paradigm and set of technologies, design productivity is an important challenge at present for RC in general and FPGA devices in particular, so that HPC users, and others, can take full advantage without having to be trained as electrical engineers.

In contrast, the structure of parallelism in reconfigurable-logic devices can be customized, that is, reconfigured, for each application or task on the fly, being versatile yet optimized specifically for each problem at hand.

It should be noted that RC, as a new paradigm of computing, is broader than FPGA acceleration for HPC. FPGA devices are the leading commercial technology available today that is capable of RC, albeit not originally designed for RC, and thus FPGAs are the focal point for virtually all experimental research and commercial deployments, with a growing list of success stories.

By contrast, numerous research studies show that computing with reconfigurable-logic devices -- FPGAs, et al. -- is fundamentally superior in terms of speed and energy, due to the many advantages of adaptive, customizable hardware parallelism.

Will RC be a niche solution in specific application areas or do you see this technology being used in general-purpose platforms that will be widely deployed?

The driving issues in this community -- again performance, productivity, and especially sustainability -- are becoming increasingly important in HPC.
HPCwire: In the past couple of years, non-RC accelerators like the Cell processor and now, especially, general-purpose GPUs have been making big news in the HPC world, with major deployments planned.

Alan George: HPC is approaching a crossroads in terms of enabling technologies and their inherent strengths and weaknesses.

Each server features a tightly-coupled set of four FPGA accelerators on a ProcStar-III PCIe board from GiDEL supported by a conventional multicore CPU, motherboard, disk, etc.

However, looking ahead more broadly, reconfigurable logic may be featured in future devices with a variety of structures, granularities, functionalities, etc., perhaps very similar to today's FPGAs or perhaps quite different.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

George: Naturally, as a relatively new paradigm of computing, RC has started with emphasis in a few targeted areas, for example, aerospace and bioinformatics, where missions and users require dramatic improvement only possible by a revolutionary approach.

Each FPGA is a Stratix-III E260 device from Altera with 254K logic elements, 768 18x18 multipliers, and more than 4GB of DDR2 memory directly attached via three banks.

In this regard, many vendors and research groups are conducting R&D and developing new concepts, tools, and products to address this challenge.

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

Each server features a tightly-coupled set of four FPGA accelerators on a ProcStar-III PCIe board from GiDEL supported by a conventional multicore CPU, motherboard, disk, etc.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

Housed in three racks, Novo-G consists of 24 standard Linux servers, plus a head node, connected by DDR InfiniBand and GigE.

Both of these project areas of productivity and architecture relate well to HPC.
Meanwhile, one of the unique features of some RC devices is their ability to reconfigure portions of the hardware of the chip while other portions remain unchanged and thus operational, and this powerful feature involves many research and design challenges being studied and addressed by several teams.

However, looking ahead more broadly, reconfigurable logic may be featured in future devices with a variety of structures, granularities, functionalities, etc., perhaps very similar to today's FPGAs or perhaps quite different.

CHREC is run by Dr. Alan George, who gave an address at the SC09 Workshop on High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing Technology and Applications (HPRCTA'09) on November 15.

Productivity is often a key challenge for a new IT technology, learning how to effectively harness and exploit the inherent advantages of the new approach.

In the U.S., the NSF Center for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing (CHREC, pronounced "shreck"), acts as the research hub for RC, bringing together more than 30 organizations in this field.

Thus, as is natural for any new paradigm and set of technologies, design productivity is an important challenge at present for RC in general and FPGA devices in particular, so that HPC users, and others, can take full advantage without having to be trained as electrical engineers.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

HPCwire: Can you talk about a few of the projects at CHREC that look especially promising?

The driving issues in this community -- again performance, productivity, and especially sustainability -- are becoming increasingly important in HPC.
HPCwire: In the past couple of years, non-RC accelerators like the Cell processor and now, especially, general-purpose GPUs have been making big news in the HPC world, with major deployments planned.

In addition, several new collaborations have been inspired by Novo-G, with other research groups, for example, Boston University and the Air Force Research Laboratory, as well as tools vendors such as Impulse Accelerated Technologies and Mitrionics.

Altogether, Novo-G features 96 of these FPGAs, with an upgrade underway that by January will double its RC capacity to 192 FPGAs via two coupled RC boards per server.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

Moreover, in terms of fundamental computing principles, they are an evolutionary development in device architecture, and as such represent less risk.

Vendors have invested heavily, both marketing and R&D, to broaden the appeal of these devices for the HPC community.

Thus, in theory, the hardware can be matched to the software, rather than the other way around.

In addition, several new collaborations have been inspired by Novo-G, with other research groups, for example, Boston University and the Air Force Research Laboratory, as well as tools vendors such as Impulse Accelerated Technologies and Mitrionics.

We got the opportunity to ask Dr. George about the work going on at the Center and what he thinks RC technology can offer to high performance computing users.

George: Naturally, as a relatively new paradigm of computing, RC has started with emphasis in a few targeted areas, for example, aerospace and bioinformatics, where missions and users require dramatic improvement only possible by a revolutionary approach.

It should be noted that RC, as a new paradigm of computing, is broader than FPGA acceleration for HPC. FPGA devices are the leading commercial technology available today that is capable of RC, albeit not originally designed for RC, and thus FPGAs are the focal point for virtually all experimental research and commercial deployments, with a growing list of success stories.

Perhaps most obviously, they are viewed as inexpensive, due to leveraging of the gaming market.

An established technology is dominant for many years; it experiences growth over a long period of time from evolutionary advances, and one day it is partially or wholly supplanted by a new, revolutionary technology, but only after that new technology has navigated a long and winding road of research and development.

For example, HPC machines lauded in the upper tier of the TOP500 list as most powerful in the world are remarkably high in performance yet also remarkably massive in size, energy, heat, and cost, all featuring programmable, fixed-logic devices, for example, CPU, GPU, Cell.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

For example, in advanced computing on space missions, high performance and versatility are critical with limited energy, size, and weight.

George: Naturally, as a relatively new paradigm of computing, RC has started with emphasis in a few targeted areas, for example, aerospace and bioinformatics, where missions and users require dramatic improvement only possible by a revolutionary approach.

Productivity is often a key challenge for a new IT technology, learning how to effectively harness and exploit the inherent advantages of the new approach.

Altogether, Novo-G features 96 of these FPGAs, with an upgrade underway that by January will double its RC capacity to 192 FPGAs via two coupled RC boards per server.

However, looking ahead more broadly, reconfigurable logic may be featured in future devices with a variety of structures, granularities, functionalities, etc., perhaps very similar to today's FPGAs or perhaps quite different.

Altogether, Novo-G features 96 of these FPGAs, with an upgrade underway that by January will double its RC capacity to 192 FPGAs via two coupled RC boards per server.

George: Novo-G became operational in July of this year and is believed to be the most powerful RC machine ever fielded for research.

While there are a handful of commercial offerings from companies such as Convey Computer, XtremeData, GiDel, Mitrionics, and Impulse Accelerated Technologies, RC is still an area of active research.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

Both of these project areas of productivity and architecture relate well to HPC.
Meanwhile, one of the unique features of some RC devices is their ability to reconfigure portions of the hardware of the chip while other portions remain unchanged and thus operational, and this powerful feature involves many research and design challenges being studied and addressed by several teams.

Goals and challenges in three principal areas are vitally important yet increasingly in conflict: performance, productivity, and sustainability.

With fixed-logic computing, the user and application have no control over underlying hardware parallelism; they simply attempt to exploit as much as the manufacturer has deemed to provide.

It should be noted that RC, as a new paradigm of computing, is broader than FPGA acceleration for HPC. FPGA devices are the leading commercial technology available today that is capable of RC, albeit not originally designed for RC, and thus FPGAs are the focal point for virtually all experimental research and commercial deployments, with a growing list of success stories.

George: On-going research projects at the four university sites of CHREC -- the University of Florida, Brigham Young University led by Dr. Brent Nelson, George Washington University led by Dr. Tarek El-Ghazawi, and Virginia Tech led by Dr. Peter Athanas -- fall into four categories: productivity, architecture, partial reconfiguration, and fault tolerance.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

Last but not least, as process densities increase and become more susceptible to faults, environments become harsher, and resources become more prone to soft or hard errors, research challenges arise in fault tolerance.

Founded in 2007, CHREC is a national research center under the auspices of the I/UCRC program of the National Science Foundation and consists of more than 30 academic, industry and government partners working collaboratively on research in this field.

Reconfigurable Computing Research Pushes Forward
Despite all the all the recent hoopla about GPGPUs and eight-core CPUs, proponents of reconfigurable computing continue to sing the praises of FPGA-based HPC. The main advantage of reconfigurable computing, or RC for short, is that programmers are able to change the circuitry of the chip on the fly.

Programmable fixed-logic devices no matter their form feature a "one size fits all" or "Jack of all trades" philosophy, with a predefined structure of parallelism, yet attempting to support all applications or some major subset.

In contrast, the structure of parallelism in reconfigurable-logic devices can be customized, that is, reconfigured, for each application or task on the fly, being versatile yet optimized specifically for each problem at hand.