Just in time for Sunday's season premiere of "Mad Men," my latest "On Language" column in The New York Times Magazine considers how authentically the show represents the speech of the 1960s. The creators of the AMC series, led by head honcho Matthew Weiner, are obsessive about getting the details of language right, just like all the other details of the show. But fans can be equally obsessive, on the lookout for the smallest linguistic anachronisms.
I got an inside peek at the careful construction of the dialogue from Weiner himself in an interview for the column. Weiner cares deeply about every nuance of the dialogue, wanting to make sure that each line is appropriate both for the character who speaks it and for the era in general. He and his fellow writers, supported by a punctilious research staff, try to leave no room for error. ("Mad Men" is not the type of show that allows the actors to go off-script and improvise, Weiner said.) When I asked Weiner if the show made allowances for well-placed anachronisms, perhaps for artistic license, he immediately discounted that possibility. "I never want it to be wrong," Weiner told me. "Any anachronisms that do occur are mistakes."
It's not surprising that a show made by perfectionists should attract an audience of perfectionists. Online fan forums and blogs question any whiff of inauthentic speech, just as they analyze details of wardrobe and set decoration. I admit to being one of the nitpickers: last season, I devoted a whole Word Routes column to a goof that the prop masters made in placing a 1987 compact edition of the Oxford English Dictionary behind the desk of the character Lane Pryce. This was big enough news to get picked up by bloggers at Entertainment Weekly and New York Magazine, an indication of just how rare such anachronisms are on the show.
True to my nitpicky nature, I describe in the column six potentially anachronistic lines from the first three seasons of the show (set in 1960, 1962, and 1963, respectively). For easy reference, I put together a video with all six of these snippets of dialogue:
Here's a quick run-down of the six lines in question:
I should stress, however, that these are truly minor quibbles. The show does an admirable job overall in taking us back to an earlier linguistic and cultural world, and the dialogue hardly ever jolts us out of that world. For lovers of language as well as lovers of finely wrought period drama, that's a real treat.
Update (Aug. 6): Perhaps Joan could have said "the medium is the message" in 1960 after all. See the letter to the editor from Fred Shapiro, author of The Yale Book of Quotations.
Ben Zimmer is executive editor of Vocabulary.com and the Visual Thesaurus. He is language columnist for The Wall Street Journal and former language columnist for The Boston Globe and The New York Times Magazine. He has worked as editor for American dictionaries at Oxford University Press and as a consultant to the Oxford English Dictionary. In addition to his regular "Word Routes" column here, he contributes to the group weblog Language Log. He is also the chair of the New Words Committee of the American Dialect Society.Click here to read other articles by Ben Zimmer